Legal Opinion

United Mine Workers of America v. Jericol Mining, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 28, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SILER, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) as the collective bargaining representative of approximately 150 production and maintenance workers who are employed by the defendant Jericol Mining, Inc. at its operation in Holmes Mill, Harlan County, Kentucky. The plaintiff seeks one of two forms of relief:

1. An order requiring the defendant Jericol to process a vacation pay disagreement under the contractual dispute resolution procedure of the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1974 (the 1974 Agreement), or

2. A resolution by this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Local Union No. 998, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. The B. & T. Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. Unión Independiente de Empleados TelefónicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  2. Ottawa County v. JaklinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union 89 v. Moog Louisville WarehouseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Local 703, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Kennicott Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union 89 v. Moog Louisville WarehouseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API