Legal Opinion

Ames v. Milam

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1915No. 4158PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma. County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Thomas M. Milam against George J. Ames to enforce payment under, a contract of sale of real estate and to foreclose a vendor’s lien. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and defendant in error as plaintiff, according to their relation in the trial court. This is an appeal from the judgment. of the district court of Oklahoma county, wherein plaintiff recovered of the defendant a decree foreclosing a vendor’s lien upon certain lots situated in Milam’s Northwest Highlands addition to Oklahoma City, Okla., and judgment for $700, the purchase price thereof.

Plaintiff in his petition alleged substantially: That said plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to sell defendant the lots…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loud v. Pomona Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Shelton v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Bass Furn. & Carpet Co. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Ozark States Trust Co. v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Kile v. KileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Mayfield v. Fidelity State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API