Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reno v. Barquet

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 1978No. 77-30PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, the State of Florida, appeals from a “final order granting motion to dismiss amended complaint.” The final order is self-explanatory and is set forth as follows:

“This action was heard on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Sworn Complaint filed by defendants.
“1. Plaintiff seeks, in Count 1, injunc-tive relief from deceptive and unfair trade practices and, in Count II, an accounting and disgorgement of all illicit proceeds.
“2. Plaintiff contends Defendants operated a clinic at 620 Southwest 1st Street where Defendants conducted pregnancy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. Sea Isle HotelSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Alsop v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Department of Legal Affairs v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Shell Oil Company v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. CosgroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Taubert v. State, Office of the Attorney GeneralDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1980
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1979
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API