Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Reno v. Barquet
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 2, 1978No. 77-30PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDRY, Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, the State of Florida, appeals from a “final order granting motion to dismiss amended complaint.” The final order is self-explanatory and is set forth as follows:
“This action was heard on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Sworn Complaint filed by defendants.
“1. Plaintiff seeks, in Count 1, injunc-tive relief from deceptive and unfair trade practices and, in Count II, an accounting and disgorgement of all illicit proceeds.
“2. Plaintiff contends Defendants operated a clinic at 620 Southwest 1st Street where Defendants conducted pregnancy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dobbs v. Sea Isle HotelSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Alsop v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Department of Legal Affairs v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Shell Oil Company v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Miami v. CosgroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Taubert v. State, Office of the Attorney GeneralDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1980
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1979
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.