Legal Opinion

Taubert v. State, Office of the Attorney General

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 30, 2011No. 1D10-4933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWolf, J.

Appellant challenges a judgment that found him in violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) for receiving payments based on phony invoices his company sent to over 1,000 corporations. The order on appeal directed appellant to repay each of the defrauded consumers, totaling $2,587,771.29, and to pay civil penalties in the amount of $2,116,500. In addition, the order directed appellant to repatriate all foreign assets and to provide an accounting within 90 days of all assets located outside the country. On appeal, appellant raises two issues. We affirm, but…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Delisi v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Hooters of America v. CAROLINA WINGSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Tax Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. State v. Beach Blvd Automotive, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic CourtSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic CourtSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API