Legal Opinion

Courson v. Tollison

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1933No. 4 Div. 634Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

POSTER, Justice.

This is not a proceeding against the sureties, but it is against the guardian in life. The sureties appeared to see to it that there would be an unbiased judicial determination of the liability of the guardian, which would affect their rights. Section 8212, Code; Bean v. Harrison, 213 Ala. 33, 104 So. 244.

The question is not analogous to a proceeding against the sureties, for their interest here is only indirect, but it is, as we have said, a proceeding against the guardian in life, after the time when he is due to make settlement.

The case of U. S. P. & G. Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bean v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PittmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Robinson v. FerdonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SinclairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API