Ruse v. Williams
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yuma. Prank Baxter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff, in two counts, against the defendants on an alleged joint and several liability for cash, goods, wares and merchandise furnished and advanced by plaintiff and his assignor, one A. G. Kurvess. In the first paragraph of the complaint the allegation is made that the defendants and each of them are transient persons in a roving band without residence, but at present domiciled in Yuma county.
A judgment on a joint and several liability of the defendants to plaintiff was entered for $1,600, interest and costs. The appeal is prosecuted from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bailey v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Gass v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
- Goesele v. BimelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- State v. Amana SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Schwartz v. DussSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hassenpflug v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Municipal Waterworks Co. v. City of Ft. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1914
- Board of Com'rs v. Southwest Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Seventh Elect Church in Israel v. First Seattle Dexter Horton National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Landon v. Kansas City Gas Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.