Legal Opinion

Maloney v. Moore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1935No. Civil No. 3673PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, J.-

— -Major C. Maloney as the owner and holder of 148 past-due coupons, of the face value of $3,840 payable to bearer and representing the semiannual interest on certain bonds of the Roosevelt Water Conservation District, seeks by this action to mandamus the treasurer of Maricopa county, Harry Moore, who is also ex-officio treasurer of such district, to pay and satisfy such coupons. He alleges that said coupons fell due July 1, 1931, and were payable at the office of the treasurer of the district or at named banks of New York City, at the option of the holder; that the defendant has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. State Ex Rel. Buckwalter v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Sullivan v. CashionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Voorhies v. Mayor of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maricopa County v. SharritArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Shumway v. FleishmanArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Morris v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API