Legal Opinion

Joseph B. Filger v. Plax Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1958No. 13423_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court dismissing plaintiff’s 1 complaint and amended complaint which stated an action for royalties alleged to be due upon sales of a plastic squeeze bottle dispenser. Plaintiff, owner of a patent for such a dispenser, and defendant, a manufacturer of plastic bottles, had agreed May 6, 1952, as follows:

“In consideration of a promise by Plax to pay to Filger a royalty of One and One-Half Cents ($.015) for each complete dispenser unit for nose drops or the like identical or substantially identical with that dis closed by Filger’s United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andrew Jergens Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. Young v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Corey v. Atlas Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. General Casualty Company of America, a Corporation v. School District No. 5, Baker County, State of Oregon, Ex Rel. S. C. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bickford v. John E. Mitchell Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  2. Bickford v. John Mitchell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API