Legal Opinion

Schurz v. Bodian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

“To state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must allege: (1) that the attorney ‘failed to exercise the ordinarily reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’; and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Leder v. SpiegelNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Dempster v. LiottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Greene v. SagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API