Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. Indiana Commission on Public Records
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided April 17, 2001No. IP 99-1160-C-T/GPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
TINDER, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, Marta O’Neill, brings claims against the Defendants, the Indiana Commission on Public Records (the “Commission”) and the State of Indiana (“Indiana”), alleging that the Defendants discriminated against the Plaintiff on account of her gender and retaliated against her for opposing such discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bervid v. AlvarezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Crumpacker v. Kansas Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- MATTINGLY v. MARION SUPERIOR COURTDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Marnocha v. City of ElkhartDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- Opp v. OFFICE OF STATE'S ATTORNEY OF COOK COUNTYDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.