Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamby v. Everett

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1982No. E 81-192Published

1DissentTom Glaze, Judge

I dissent. The Appeal Tribunal awarded benefits to appellant, and the Board of Review later reversed and denied benefits. In awarding benefits, the Appeal Tribunal obviously believed claimant’s testimony, but in denying benefits, the Board clearly chose to disbelieve her testimony. The difference between the Appeal Tribunal proceedings here and that conducted by the Board was the Tribunal observed the demeanor of the witnesses who testified. Although the Board is authorized to take testimony and other evidence, it did not do so in this case. As was true in this appeal to the Board of Review,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Clay v. Crooks IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ark. Coal Co. v. SteeleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Mata v. Broadmore HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Drewry v. DrewryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API