Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Concentrix Solutions Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 7, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00266Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Adam Barnett, No. CV-22-00266-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Concentrix Solutions Corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Collective and Class 16 Action Complaint (Doc. 12) filed by Defendants Concentrix Solutions Corporation and 17 Concentrix CVG Customer Management Group Incorporated (collectively “Concentrix”). 18 Plaintiff Adam Barnett (“Plaintiff”) filed a Response (Doc. 23) and Concentrix filed a 19 Reply (Doc. 34). Also pending is…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.