Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance v. Amerford Air Cargo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1987No. 85 Civ. 3887 (JMC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a), (b).
BACKGROUND
Defendant Amerford Air Cargo [“Amer-ford”] is an air freight forwarder. Its business consists of picking up goods from its customers, arranging air transport on a direct air carrier, consolidating the goods in preparation for transport, and delivering them to the air carrier. For this service, Amerford’s customers pay a single fee, which includes the cost of the flight.
IBM World Trade Corporation and Semi-Alloys,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- I.C.C. Metals, Inc. v. Municipal Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Berner v. British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Colgate Palmolive Co. v. S/S Dart CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Baker v. Lansdell Protective Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Victoria Sales Corp. v. Emery Air Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Kabbani v. International Total ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Baloise Ins. Co., Ltd. v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Jacky Maeder (Hong Kong) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Jaycees Patou, Inc. v. Pier Air International, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.