Legal Opinion
Powell v. Senville 35th Street Realty Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided April 24, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur Wachtel, J.
Plaintiff sued the defendants, Senville 35th Street Realty Corp., hereinafter referred to as Senville, and Millard Shroder, Inc., for injuries sustained by him while he was employed as an electrician by Brown Electric Co. during the course of construction of premises 165 East 35th Street, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, owned by defendant Senville. Senville is also the builder and general contractor. Millard Shroder, Inc., was sued on the basis of supervision of the construction work.
Plaintiff based his claim upon a defective condition existing by reason of a wood covering on a hole…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Walters v. Rao Electrical Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Rufo v. OrlandoNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Turner Construction Co. v. Rockwood Sprinkler Co. of MassachusettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Petersen v. Rand Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- Zullo v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963