Legal Opinion
County of Boyd v. US Ecology, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 21, 1994No. 4:CV93-3435PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
Defendant US Ecology, Inc. (US Ecology) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 12), together with an Index of Evidence Offered in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 13). The essence of US Ecology’s motion is that this case is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Finding that US Ecology’s position is meritorious, I shall grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety and enter judgment in favor of Defendant US Ecology and against Plaintiffs,^ providing that Plaintiffs shall take nothing because…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Blue Dane Simmental Corp. v. American Simmental Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1997
- Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1999
- County of Boyd v. US Ecology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Abels v. Titan International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.