Legal Opinion
Yates v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 17, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2026-2089Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARIE YATES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 26-02089 (UNA) v. ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a complaint for injunctive relief, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), and a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO). For the following reasons, the court grants the IFP motion, denies the TRO motion, and dismisses the complaint. Plaintiff’s housing case is pending in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See Yates v. N.H.P.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lewis v. GreenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- JMM Corp. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.