Legal Opinion

Whipps, L.L.C. v. Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, P.C.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2007No. DA 06-0028PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Whipps, L.L.C. (Whipps), as landlord, and Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, P.C. (Kaufman), as tenants, entered into a commercial lease agreement. Shortly after taking possession of the premises Kaufman vacated them. Whipps sued for breach of a commercial lease and Kaufman filed a counterclaim for fraud and breach of contract. After offers and counter-offers were made, Kaufman tendered an Offer of Judgment pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 68 (Rule 68). Whipps accepted the Offer and the District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District entered Judgment accordingly. Subsequently, Whipps moved for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. H-D Irrigating, Inc. v. Kimble Properties, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pumphrey v. Empire Lath & PlasterMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Montana Fair Housing, Inc. v. BarnesMontana Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murphy Homes, Inc. v. MullerMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. David W. v. Paramount Homes, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Sullivan v. CherewickMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Heringer v. BarnegatMontana Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API