Legal Opinion

Mulder v. PCS HEALTH SYSTEMS. INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 11, 2006No. Civ. 98-1003(WGB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BASSLER, Senior District Judge.

This class action presents the issue of ; whether a pharmaceutical benefits management company may be subject to the fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) for the services it provides to an HMO. 1 Defendant moves for summary judgment on plaintiffs claim. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants summary judgment.

I. Background

Plaintiff Ed Mulder (“Plaintiff’) participated in an employee benefit plan sponsored by his employer Scott Printing Co. (“Scott”). Plaintiff received his health…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Express Scripts/Anthem Erisa Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Moeckel Ex Rel. Morrell v. Caremark, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API