Legal Opinion

Dublin v. Prime

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Prime appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated June 19, 1989, as granted the cross motion of the defendant McNeilab, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the appeal must be dismissed because the appellant is not aggrieved by the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint against his codefendant, McNeilab, Inc. (see, CPLR…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hauser v. North Rockland Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andrew Keith Properties, Inc. v. Hubinette Cowell Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Doris v. CaliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Mixon v. TBV, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Wilcox Development Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Continental Custom Wood Finishing Corp. v. Chestnut Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API