Legal Opinion

Whigham v. Pyle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1973No. Appeal, 368PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaulding, J.,

Appellant Donald Whigham appeals from the granting of appellees’ motion for summary judgment in an action brought to recover for injuries suffered by Ms minor son, Gary, while trespassing on land owned by appellee James Pyle in Indiana Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.

Appellee Pyle owns a 45.50-acre tract of undeveloped land surrounded by commercial and residential properties, including appellants’ residence. Gary and Ms minor friends had regularly flown kites, played football and baseball, and ridden bicycles on appellee’s property. Pyle knew about, and had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Dumanski v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Kopar v. MAMONESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Jesko v. TurkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Michigan Bank v. SteensenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wiegand by Wiegand v. Mars Nat. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Frank v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Norton v. City of EastonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Beckett v. Kamaratos, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1998
  5. G.W.E. v. R.E.Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API