Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wieland v. Moore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1997No. S-96-429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

William A. Wieland commenced this original action requesting, inter alia, a writ of mandamus instructing the Secretary of State (Secretary) to withhold a number of legislatively proposed constitutional amendments from the May 14, 1996, election ballot. A second amended petition requested, in the alternative, a declaratory judgment that certain legislatively proposed amendments to the Nebraska Constitution which appeared on the May 14, 1996, ballot were null and void as a matter of law.

FACTS

During the first session of the 94th Legislature, the Nebraska Legislature passed the following…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of Kimball County, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ControlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wilson v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State ex rel. Smrha v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. Pacific Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Reed Bros. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Weeping Water.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Loontjer v. GaleNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API