Legal Opinion

Lingquist v. Seibold

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1921No. 4,412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Clark County; W. H. Doorman, Judge. Action by F. W. Lingquist against J. W. Seibold, administrator of John W. O’Neill, deceased. Verdict for defendant, and, from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER SPENCER

prepared the opinion for the court.

For a first cause of action the plaintiff herein claims damages in the sum of $3,000, pursuant to the terms of a contract entered into between plaintiff and decedent on March 14, 1912, whereby the decedent agreed, among other things, to pay to the plaintiff one-half of the difference between the agreed selling price of decedent’s land, or $12,000, and the amount of a mortgage against the land for $6,000 if the plaintiff should effectuate sale of decedent’s land according to the terms of their contract. Plaintiff alleges that in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Largey v. MantleMontana Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burns v. EmingerMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Miller Insurance Agency v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stewart v. Arrow Creek Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API