Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Treece

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1933No. 4-3115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is contended for reversal that the testimony was not sufficient to support the verdict, and that the court erred in not sustaining appellant’s demurrer to the evidence at the time the appellee rested his case.

The complaint alleged, and it’ was conceded, that appellee at the time of his injury was working upon one of appellant’s bridges upon which was laid its railroad track-used in interstate commerce, and that the case falls within the provisions of the Federal Employer’s Liability Act.

Appellee was working with an extra gang on one of appellant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  3. New York, N. H. & H. R. v. VizvariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  4. F. Kiech Manufacturing Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Lehigh Valley R. v. SkoczylaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southeast Arkansas Telephone & Power Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Motors Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API