Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Lawson

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 4, 1993No. 13-91-523-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

Appellant, Dana Gleason, raises three points of error following a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding her 40% comparatively responsible in a two-car automobile collision. She also complains that the trial court erred by requiring each party to bear its own costs. We modify and affirm.

Gleason, the driver of one car, sued ap-pellee, Carol Lawson, the driver of another car. Lawson’s car rear-ended Gleason’s car, injuring Gleason.

The accident occurred in Fort Bend County as Gleason was exiting U.S. Highway 90 and merging onto State Highway 6. Gleason…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Lewelling v. LewellingTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rogers v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
  2. Roberts v. Rose, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. Pirtle, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1998
  4. Nicholson v. Tashiro, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  5. Alma Nicholson v. Rodney T. Tashiro, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API