Legal Opinion
Strickland v. Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 19, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Presumably, the returns by the registrar and. judges of each precinct to the County Board were made in the manner prescribed by statute (G.S. 163-85; G.S. 163-84, as amended by .Chapter 891, Session Laws of 1955), and nothing on the face thereof indicated irregularity in the counting of ballots or in the tabulation of the votes cast for the respective candidates.
Petitioner, relying upon G.S. 163-143 and Brown v. Costen, 176 N.C. 63, 96 S.E. 659, and on a rule promulgated by the State Board of Elections, contended the County Board should declare and certify petitioner as the Democratic nominee…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodall v. Western Wake Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Britt v. . Board of CanvassersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Gatling v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- States' Rights Democratic Party v. North Carolina State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Board of Education v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ponder v. JoslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964