Legal Opinion · Dissent

Territory v. Crowley

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1939No. Nos. 2371, 2372Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

PETERS, J.

I respectfully dissent.

Both defendants should be granted a new trial. The trial court committed reversible error by instructing the jury as requested by the prosecution that it was incumbent upon the defendants to prove justification by a preponderance of the evidence.

The court, at the request of the prosecution, charged the jury as follows: “You are instructed that the burden is on the Territory in these cases to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendants (or either of them) published, or aided in the publication of, a libelous article as charged; but once…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API