Territory v. Crowley
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
PETERS, J.
I respectfully dissent.
Both defendants should be granted a new trial. The trial court committed reversible error by instructing the jury as requested by the prosecution that it was incumbent upon the defendants to prove justification by a preponderance of the evidence.
The court, at the request of the prosecution, charged the jury as follows: “You are instructed that the burden is on the Territory in these cases to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendants (or either of them) published, or aided in the publication of, a libelous article as charged; but once…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.