United States v. Daniel W. Duran
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
Daniel Duran appeals -his sentence for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d); and use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). He claims the district court erred by imposing an enhancement for reckless endangerment when no nexus existed between the crime for which he was convicted and his reckless behavior. Duran also claims that the district court erred by stating insufficient or improper reasons for its sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On August…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Edward X. MondelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ralph Anthony UpshawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William R. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by51 opinions
- Tapia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Jawad MiqbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Marlin Hawk WingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.