Legal Opinion

Heiden v. Loup River Public Power District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1941No. 30999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, District Judge.

This is a suit for permanent damages to plaintiff’s farm caused by seepage from the defendant’s reservoir. The plaintiff had judgment for $13,000, and defendant appealed.

The defendant is a public power district organized under chapter 86, Laws 1933, and amendments thereto. Plaintiff’s farm is located two miles north from the city of Columbus. Fifty acres thereof are pasture and farm land lying on the side of a hill. Upon this hill are also located plaintiff’s farm buildings and dwelling-house, a modern home built in 1933. The remaining portion of said farm, consisting of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. EmmertNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. HarlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Irvine v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Collins v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Applegate v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Auker v. Steckley's Hybrid Seed Corn Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Smith v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Leffelman v. City of HartingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Horky v. SchrollNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Doleman v. BurandtNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API