Legal Opinion

Poling v. Condon-Lane Boom & Lumber Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1904PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tucker County. Bill by J. E. Poling, trustee, against the Condon-Lane Boom and Lumber Company and others. Decree for plaintiff and the above named defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MilleR, Judge:

The appellant, Condon-Lane Boom and Lumber Company, and defendant, George Pyle, made a contract for the sale and delivery of saw logs, .contained in the following letters: “Bretz, W. Va., July 20, 1892. Mr. George Pyle, Hendricks, W. Va. Dear Sir: — We will buy your logs on Laurel Fork of the Cheat Eiver, to be put in Laurel Fork not more than fifteen miles, from its mouth, and to be driven into the Dry Fork of the Cheat Eiver. We to furnish a scaler, who will be satisfactory to both parties; you to pay 50 cts. per day and board the scaler, and we to pay the balance of his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Winchester v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Teass v. City of St. AlbansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Boyd v. GunnisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Bannister v. Victoria Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McKinley v. LynchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gartland v. HickmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API