Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Gossett

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 17, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The evidence established a violation by the plaintiff of article 12 of the Tax Law, as amended, and it follows that she was barred from maintaining an action based upon the transfer. The fact that the action was on the note given in consideration of the transfer does not give the plaintiff any greater rights than she would have possessed had the action been brought for part of the purchase price not evidenced by a note. Matter of Wylly (210 Fed. 954) is distinguishable since section 278 of our Tax Law (as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 354) applies only to an action or proceeding in the courts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re WyllyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1913
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of BorstNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  3. In re the Estate of ShelleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wylie v. AddomsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API