O'Brien v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These are actions of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of a motorman in charge of a trolley car of the defendant. Uncontroverted facts were that an automobile with left hand drive, driven by the plaintiff O’Brien, with whom the plaintiff Higgins was riding as a guest, passed the stationary trolley car in Davis Square, Somerville, proceeded down Elm Street, and at some point came partly upon the track in front of the following trolley car; that the automobile was brought to a stop on the track near the corner of Elm and Russell…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Lawrence v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Williamson v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sharp v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Johnson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925