Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are actions of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of a motorman in charge of a trolley car of the defendant. Uncontroverted facts were that an automobile with left hand drive, driven by the plaintiff O’Brien, with whom the plaintiff Higgins was riding as a guest, passed the stationary trolley car in Davis Square, Somerville, proceeded down Elm Street, and at some point came partly upon the track in front of the following trolley car; that the automobile was brought to a stop on the track near the corner of Elm and Russell…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Lawrence v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Williamson v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Johnson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API