Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 28, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

There was testimony tending to show that the plaintiff, in order to pass a slow moving truck, turned his automobile on to surface tracks between posts supporting the elevated structure of the defendant; that before doing so he looked back a distance of fifty or sixty feet and saw no trolley car, and then put out his hand in token of intention to turn; and that after getting upon the rails he travelled ten or fifteen feet when the rear of the automobile *108was struck by a trolley car, which he had passed some distance back while it was at a standstill at a regular stopping place. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Fitzgerald v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Farris v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Eustis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Johnson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API