Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Buckley
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVincent A. Lupiano, J.
An unusual factual situation is presented by the opposing papers in this motion for summary judgment. However, while unusual, the facts resolve themselves into a singular, insuperable conclusion.
The action is one for declaratory judgment whereby plaintiff seeks to have declared null and void the decree of divorce secured by her husband, the defendant Daniel Buckley. The parties were married in New York City on May 15, 1917; there are no children of the marriage. They separated in April of 1932 and entered into a separation agreement in writing. On or about January 3, 1940, Daniel Buckley…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caldwell v. CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Rosenbaum v. RosenbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Querze v. QuerzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- In re the Accounting of RathscheckNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Vose v. VoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buckley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Faragasso v. FaragassoNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Buckley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Estate of Felt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Johannsen v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1960