Legal Opinion

Kindt v. State Commission for Human Rights

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Farnham, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law (art. 15, known as the Law Against Discrimination) seeking a review and annulment of an order dated March 4, 1964, made by the State Commission for Human Rights, following a proceeding before the commission. The commission is cross petitioner, and pursuant to section 298 seeks a court order enforcing the commission’s order of March 4, 1964. In short, the commission’s order referred to above results from the following facts.

*897The petitioners, Mary and Henry Kindt, owned premises located at No. 1201 Madison Street, Syracuse, New…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Holland v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colorado Civil Rights Com'n v. STATE, SCH. DIST. NO. 1Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. New York State Division of Human Rights v. New York-Pennsylvania Professional Baseball LeagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Moskal v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. Lawrence Gardens, Inc. v. State Commission for Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. New York City Department of Personnel v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API