Legal Opinion

State v. Jiles

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 2009No. A08-1466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION. TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellant State of Minnesota argues that the district court erred by departing from the mandatory minimum sentence after respondent Derrik Leon Jiles was convicted of illegally possessing a firearm. Because an extended-jurisdiction juvenile (EJJ) adjudication is considered a conviction for purposes of Minn.Stat. § 609.11, subd. 8(b), we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent is ineligible to possess firearms based upon an EJJ adjudication of second-degree assault involving a firearm in 1998 and a conviction of theft of a motor vehicle in 2001. On March 25, 2008,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Marchello RembertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. NashCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API