Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1997No. 1994-2734PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 112.] THE STATE EX REL. CAWTHORN, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Indus. Comm.,

1997-Ohio-241.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion in finding a lack of “special circumstances” sufficient to support claimant’s proposed increase in his average weekly wage, when. (No. 94-2734—Submitted January 21,1997—Decided April 2, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APD11-1523. __________________ {¶ 1} On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wireman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Riley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Price v. Cent. Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Lemke v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Stevens v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Gillette v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (6-21-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API