State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 112.] THE STATE EX REL. CAWTHORN, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Indus. Comm.,
1997-Ohio-241.] Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion in finding a lack of “special circumstances” sufficient to support claimant’s proposed increase in his average weekly wage, when. (No. 94-2734—Submitted January 21,1997—Decided April 2, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APD11-1523. __________________ {¶ 1} On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Wireman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Clark v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Riley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Price v. Cent. Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Lemke v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Stevens v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Gillette v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (6-21-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.