Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Clark v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1994No. 93-1008PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

As “the basis upon which to compute benefits,” R.C. 4123.61, average weekly wage “is designed to ‘find a fair basis for award for the loss of future compensation.’ ” State ex rel. Wireman v. Indus. Comm. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 286, 287, 551 N.E.2d 1265, 1266-1267, quoting Riley v. Indus. Comm. (1983), 9 Ohio App.3d 71, 73, 9 OBR 90, 92, 458 N.E.2d 428, 430.

*565The standard formula for establishing AWW is to divide claimant’s earnings for the year preceding injury by fifty-two weeks. Two exceptions exist.

The first directs the commission to eliminate from the weekly denominator any period of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wireman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Riley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. McDulin v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Cawthorn v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Lemke v. Wellman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Price v. Cent. Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API