Legal Opinion · Dissent

Saenger Amusement Co. v. Masur

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 27, 1925No. 25051Published

1Dissent

I think the evidence of title was sufficient under the circumstances. See Brander v. Goodin, 6 La. Ann. 521; Taylor v. Hancock, 14 La. Ann. 693; Yorke v. Scott, 23 La. Ann. 55. I therefore dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor, Knapp & Co. v. W. J. Hancock & CoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  2. Brander v. GoodinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
  3. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871