Legal Opinion · Dissent
Saenger Amusement Co. v. Masur
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 27, 1925No. 25051Published
1Dissent
I think the evidence of title was sufficient under the circumstances. See Brander v. Goodin, 6 La. Ann. 521; Taylor v. Hancock, 14 La. Ann. 693; Yorke v. Scott, 23 La. Ann. 55. I therefore dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor, Knapp & Co. v. W. J. Hancock & CoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Brander v. GoodinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871