Legal Opinion
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1993No. 92-1201PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe (Tribe) sued Amoco Production Company (Amoco) and other oil companies and individuals, claiming they were extracting from their oil and gas leases coalbed methane reserved by the United States for the benefit of the Tribe. The district court certified a defendant class,1 and also issued a cost allocation order requiring the Tribe to pay the oil companies 25% of the companies’ cost of mineral and land title examinations from which the Tribe desired to obtain names in order to notify the class defendants. Amoco asserts that we lack jurisdiction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert E. Kennedy, Jr. Joyce Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, William T. Hanton (85-3819), Frank Wszelaki (85-3827)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. CosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Woodruff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.