Legal Opinion

State v. Palmer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1979No. 10761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Chief Judge.

A jury found defendant guilty of assault with intent to do great bodily harm without malice aforethought and he received a sentence of five years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals.

Defendant’s sole “point relied on” is that he was entitled to a new trial because of jury misconduct and that the trial court erred in failing to grant that relief. This claim of error was assigned initially in defendant’s motion for new trial.

The alleged misconduct consisted of a jur- or making an unauthorized inspection of the yard of the house where the offense occurred. Defendant claims that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. State v. McDanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. State v. WarrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. State v. RobbinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. TurleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Deltic Timber Corp. v. NewlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Presley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Presley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API