Laitram Corp. v. Depoe Bay Fish Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
REDDEN, District Judge:
This is a suit for patent infringement brought by the Laitram Corporation, holder of U.S. Patent No. 3,276,878 (hereafter the ’878 patent). That patent covers a process for peeling shrimp mechanically after they are cooked. The defendants in this action are two seafood processors who, the plaintiff asserts, use the process in their operations and do not pay royalties. The defendants claim that the ’878 patent is invalid and assert all defenses: obviousness, new matter, usefulness, wrong inventor, fraud on the patent office, patent misuse and non-infringement. The case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.