Jones v. McDaniel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Jones appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus and its denial of his request for a Rhines stay and abeyance. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 277-78, 125 *786S.Ct. 1528, 161 L.Ed.2d 440 (2005). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a), and we affirm.
Jones did not fairly present his habeas claims regarding his plea agreement to the Nevada state courts, a prerequisite to the federal court’s consideration of those claims. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); Casey v. Moore, 386…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gary Paul Cassett v. Terry L. Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- John David Roettgen v. Dale Copeland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Erick K. Winston v. E. Silva, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Hudson v. AndesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Winters v. SanchezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024