Legal Opinion

Jones v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 2009No. 08-15458PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Jones appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus and its denial of his request for a Rhines stay and abeyance. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 277-78, 125 *786S.Ct. 1528, 161 L.Ed.2d 440 (2005). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a), and we affirm.

Jones did not fairly present his habeas claims regarding his plea agreement to the Nevada state courts, a prerequisite to the federal court’s consideration of those claims. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); Casey v. Moore, 386…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Gary Paul Cassett v. Terry L. Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. John David Roettgen v. Dale Copeland, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erick K. Winston v. E. Silva, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  2. Hudson v. AndesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Winters v. SanchezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API