State v. Dupont
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.
The State of Florida challenges several trial court orders suppressing statements Francis A. DuPont made to police in connection with his charge for first-degree murder. On appeal, we review three rulings made by the trial court: police psychologically coerced DuPont to make involuntary statements; police violated DuPont’s Miranda1 rights during his interrogation; and police violated DuPont’s due process rights by failing to record his interrogation. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
First, we conclude that DuPont’s statements were not the product of coercive police…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Francis SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- William D. Christopher v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. DeWeeseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Lowery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- State v. DeWeeseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003