Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. Bell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The object of this suit, which was instituted by F. B. Bell, was to set aside a deed from Inez E. Sanderson *417and her husband to William T. Garrett, her father, conveying her one-fifth undivided remainder interest in and to a tract of land containing two hundred acres, more or less, upon the ground that the conveyance was executed for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding the appellee in the collection of the sum of $2,586.25 due him by Mrs. Sanderson, evidenced by a negotiable note.

The material allegations of the bill are:. That on the 28th day of August, 1913, William T. Garrett…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Hazlewood v. ForrerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Todd v. SykesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  4. Fischer v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Shoemaker v. Chapman Drug Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of Pocahontas v. FerimerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  2. First National Bank v. PressleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Irby v. GardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Nugent v. NugentSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API