Legal Opinion
United States v. Cooper
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 21, 2007No. 06-6309PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Adrian Cooper seeks to appeal the restitution award imposed by the district court and its decision to require Mr. Cooper to submit a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. Specifically, Mr. Cooper argues that the government failed to produce sufficient evidence to prove that Joshua Kuhn was a “victim” of Mr. Cooper’s related conduct, and that the total restitution award should be reduced by $135,000 as a result. Mr. Cooper also argues that the condition of supervised release violates the Fourth Amendment, given that he is a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Robert Ray Mhoon, Takura Fujiwara, and Melinda Isabel FujiwaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Donald BehrmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. James SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. OkoyeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. HolzerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.