Legal Opinion

State v. Stickney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1986No. 85-544PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant-appellant, Richard E. Stickney, appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion for post conviction relief. We dismiss the appeal.

Stickney’s direct appeal, challenging solely the excessiveness of his sentence after his plea of guilty to attempted firvst degree sexual assault, was affirmed in State v. Stickney, 216 Neb. xxi (case No. 83-571; Jan. 18, 1984). On December 3, 1984, Stickney filed his 14-page pro se “MOTION TO VACATE AND SET ASIDE CONVICTION,” “pursuant to the provisions of the Nebraska Post Conviction Relief Act, sections 29-3001 to 29-3004 (Reissue 1979).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dobrovolny v. DunningNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BrashearNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. HarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WymanNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Spotted ElkNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. McCormickNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. ShepardNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Victor v. HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API