State v. Stickney
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Defendant-appellant, Richard E. Stickney, appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion for post conviction relief. We dismiss the appeal.
Stickney’s direct appeal, challenging solely the excessiveness of his sentence after his plea of guilty to attempted firvst degree sexual assault, was affirmed in State v. Stickney, 216 Neb. xxi (case No. 83-571; Jan. 18, 1984). On December 3, 1984, Stickney filed his 14-page pro se “MOTION TO VACATE AND SET ASIDE CONVICTION,” “pursuant to the provisions of the Nebraska Post Conviction Relief Act, sections 29-3001 to 29-3004 (Reissue 1979).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dobrovolny v. DunningNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BrashearNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WymanNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Spotted ElkNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. McCormickNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ShepardNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Victor v. HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1995