Rodman v. Murphy
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
McIntyre, Frances A.,
J. This case requires the court to interpret the relationship between G.L.c. 151B (1992 ed.)2and G.L.c. 93, §§102 and 103 (1992 *57ed.) (equal rights act).3 Plaintiff, Edward Rodman (“Rodman”), of Peabody, Massachusetts, alleges that defendants Mail Boxes, Etc., Inc.4 (“Mail Boxes”) and Daniel Murphy (“Murphy”), of Danvers, Massachusetts, compensated him less favorably than a younger worker and laid him off because he was 73 years old, thus violating Mass. G.L.c. 93, §103. For this violation, Rodman seeks back pay, compensatory damages, damages for emotional distress, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.