Legal Opinion

Rodman v. Murphy

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 21, 2006No. 050781Published

1Opinion of the Court

McIntyre, Frances A.,

J. This case requires the court to interpret the relationship between G.L.c. 151B (1992 ed.)2and G.L.c. 93, §§102 and 103 (1992 *57ed.) (equal rights act).3 Plaintiff, Edward Rodman (“Rodman”), of Peabody, Massachusetts, alleges that defendants Mail Boxes, Etc., Inc.4 (“Mail Boxes”) and Daniel Murphy (“Murphy”), of Danvers, Massachusetts, compensated him less favorably than a younger worker and laid him off because he was 73 years old, thus violating Mass. G.L.c. 93, §103. For this violation, Rodman seeks back pay, compensatory damages, damages for emotional distress, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API