Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hassey

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 24, 1996No. 95-P-1201PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Following recross-examination of a defense witness by the prosecutor, the trial judge launched into a penetrating examination of that witness about why he had not previously gone to the police with his exculpatory information. By the time the judge had done with the witness, it was likely he left the impression with the jury that he thought the witness a liar. It was error on the part of the judge to have conducted the examination because an insufficient basis had been established for it and because the examination exceeded what are generally the limits for judicial intervention in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. MarzanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. EgertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. AlvesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. VelezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Adoption of NorbertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API