Commonwealth v. Roberts
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
On July 29, 1997, a jury convicted the defendant of murder in the first degree on the theory of deliberate premeditation.1 We consolidate the appeal from his conviction with his appeal from the trial judge’s denial of his motion for a new trial, and affirm both the conviction and the denial of the motion. After reviewing the whole record, we decline to exercise our power under G. L. c. 278, § 33E, to order a new trial or to direct entry of a verdict of a lesser degree of guilt. See Commonwealth v. Nieves, 429 Mass. 763, 764, 770 (1999).
1. Facts. The jury could have found the following facts.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. GreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. AcevedoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. NardiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- People v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Commonwealth v. GentileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.