Walker v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant Mary A. Walker challenges the DOES Office of Appeals and Review’s upholding of an appeals examiner’s decision to deny unemployment benefits based on misconduct D.C.Code § 46 — 111(b)(2) (1996). We affirm the agency’s decision.
We defer to agency findings of fact so long as they are supported by substantial evidence. Cooper v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 588 A.2d 1172, 1174 (D.C.1991). Evidence in the record supports a finding that Walker presented false and misleading information about the circumstances of a prior job termination on her application for employment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cooper v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Woodhams v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Scott v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Leonard v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tyler v. George Washington Medical Faculty AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013